Handout 5 - Critically Evaluating Material for Credibility and Appropriateness

 All information sources—periodical articles, books, web sites, and any other information sources are suspect until you evaluate them for credibility, quality and appropriateness. Use the factors below to evaluate your sources before you decide to use them for your research. All of the criteria should be evident from a quick examination of the source. It is critical that you use credible (trustworthy, believable) information to support your research efforts. Know what you are reading, why it is important, and why you want to use it.

Criteria for evaluating articles, books, media (see web sites below)

Authority:
  • who is the author and publisher
  • does the author have credentials (degrees, background in the field, relevant experience)
  • is s/he affiliated with a university, scholarly society, professional association, government agency, etc.
  • is the publisher reputable-commercial, trade, university press, scholarly society or association, government agency, etc.
If not, how do you determine whether the author is a credible source? Why should you believe anything that is presented?

Quality/Objectivity:

  • what is the purpose of the article or book—why was it written
  • who is the intended audience
  • is the content objective and the language unbiased
  • does the source contain references and a bibliography or works cited section
  • is the time frame and subject coverage clearly apparent
  • when was it written/published—is the information current, outdated, or is it an historical overview
If you cannot determine the purpose and currency of the information and what it is based upon (what sources did the author consult), why should you use the information in your research project?

Appropriateness:

  • does the material enhance or support your research
  • is the material scholarly (and peer-reviewed), when required
  • is the source primary or secondary, as is required
  • is the scope (breadth and depth) sufficient for your topic
  • is the material current or timely for your topic—does it fall within a required date range
If not, you will be wasting your time and energy reviewing sources that do not fit with your assignment or your topic.

 

Criteria for Evaluating Internet sites

Authority:
  • who is the author and/or sponsor-publisher—is it apparent
  • is the author credentialed and the sponsor-publisher reputable—can you contact the author by phone, mail or email (usually, the author of the page is not the Webmaster or the company responsible for actually uploading the web page)
  • is there an affiliation with an institution, scholarly society, professional association, commercial enterprise
  • if the author or sponsor is not a governmental or educational institution, there should be an "About Us" or "Who We Are" link that gives you the necessary information
If not, how do you determine whether the author is a credible source? Why should you believe anything that is presented?

Quality/Objectivity:

  • check the domain name of the URL (if not .edu or .gov, beware)—some .orgs and .coms are OK
  • what is the purpose of the web page—why was it written and for whom (audience)
  • is the content clear and objective and the language unbiased—much of the information available on the Internet consists of unsubstantiated opinion and outright falsehoods intended to sell, entertain, persuade, or convert you
  • look for links to additional sites for further exploration—are they relevant to the topic
  • are included links broken or viable
  • does the source contain references and a bibliography or works cited section
  • is the site easy to navigate
  • does it require you to purchase special software or pay fees to obtain some of the information
  • is there limited or no advertising
  • is the time frame and subject coverage clearly apparent
  • when was it written/published/last updated—is the information current, outdated, etc.
If you cannot determine whether the information is trustworthy, why should you use it in your research project?

Appropriateness

  • does the material enhance or support your research
  • is the material scholarly (and peer-reviewed), when required
  • is the source primary or secondary, as is required
  • is the scope (breadth and depth) sufficient for your topic
  • is the material current and timely for your topic—does it fall within a required range
If not, you will be wasting your time and energy reviewing sources that do not fit with your assignment or your topic.